🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing group of states are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our kids' innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to enact a bill increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is provided. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a solid foundation," stated a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "based on strong research".

Previously, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have raised apprehensions. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build products and services that are safe and fit for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is mostly happening at the state level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures demanding guardian approval for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from various politicians to follow this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond the West, other nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations strike a more measured position. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

Even as this worldwide discussion evolves, the actions of Australia and others indicate that governments internationally are no longer willing to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.